Opinion: @netcrit ponders web2.0 and Moodle Modules


Matthew Allen (@netcrit) posted and interesting piece about Moodle plug-ins and their comparison with web2.0 tools that can be easily integrated into the classroom. With the proliferation of embeddable content, will plug-ins and modules be replaced and allow for teachers to “off-shore” standard LMS functionality to other web services?  It’s an interesting proposition, and one that would mean a simpler approach to creating core functions of learning management systems (not to mention Moodle).  Here’s a link to the post: http://www.netcrit.net/ideas/do-moodle-plugins-mean-a-web-2-0-approach-is-redundant/

Post Pages - Post Inline - WIRIS

As a long-time participant in the online learning field, Matt ponders,

a constructivist approach probably comes from the teacher’s design of the study program and not the technology itself.

Meaning the integration and use of bits and pieces (plug-ins and embedded content) have less bearing on outcomes than the teacher’s design overall, which I think is being more seriously explored by Tomaz Lasic and the Moodletown Water! project.  Plug-ins provide a major boost to flexibility and capability for Moodle, and compared to other LMSs can justify adoption or abandonment.

His conclusion is that web2.0 can provide a greater flexibility and perhaps more success in learning outcomes because the services (unlike many Moodle plug-ins) continue to be used as students move to the job force and are maintained by dedicated developers.  This is compared to the situation with plug-ins which need continuous development in order to be used in conjunction with new releases or custom systems.

So…are there plug-ins that you can’t replace with web2.0 services or vice versa?  What are they?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.