Teen Survey Warning: In Social Learning, Think Instagram, Not Facebook

Teen Survey Warning For MoodleNet Think Instagram, Not Facebook

With the launch of MoodleNet on the horizon, the importance of teen behavior, habits, and rationales in social networks should spark a growing interest for Moodlers in development, design, and possibly instructional design as well.

Post Pages - Post Inline - WIRIS

The recently launched Pew Research Center’s “Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018” reports on a survey of the evolving habits of teens (aged 13 to 17) in the US. The landscape differs from the previous report 3 years earlier. Facebook is no longer the main attraction, going from 71 to 51% of respondents saying the use the social network. Its use (and decline thereof) seems to correlate with income, as Facebook is still being used by 70% of respondents with household income under $30,000 USD but by only 36% of those in households $75,000 or higher.

In contrast, YouTube is now essentially mandatory for teens, with 85% of respondents stating they use it, and 32% deeming it the most often used. It is worth noting that 3 years ago, Pew did not consider YouTube a choice on the survey. When it comes to the network teens use most often, the video site is second to Snapchat, the most often used by 35% of respondents and the third most popular with 69% of respondents as users.

Asked about the effects of social media, 45% of teens deemed it as “neither positive or negative,” 31% “mostly positive” and 24% “mostly negative.”


Second place goes to Instagram with 72%, growing from 52% 3 years ago, when it was also second, but behind Facebook rather than YouTube. Delving into the reasons why teens use social networks (any one of them) and the positive benefits they gain, connecting with friends and family (40%), with news and current information (16%), or with people with compatible interests (15%) are the most agreed upon ones. Other main uses of social media are entertainment and upliftment (9%), self-expression (7%), and “getting support from others” (5%). Learning was chosen as the main positive reason by 4% of the sample.

As the survey focuses on end benefits, it provides no insight about features or interface elements that would lead a teen to choose one site over another. However, the design of the rising sites seems to contrast that of Facebook. Take Instagram. Acquired by Facebook in 2012, it has gone from an alternative to the behemoth’s most clear chance of long-term relevance. Mike Krieger and Kevin Systrom, Instagram’s co-founders and current CTO and CEO, respectfully, tread carefully on the lessons Facebook’s growth teaches, outright avoiding some of the practices that led to its exponential growth early on. Some of Facebook’s renowned features unlikely to end up on Instagram include a brimming interface, an oversized number of posting content formats, and –emphatically so– the ability to share someone else’s content (“re-posting”) with just a click.

Far from Facebook’s record 2.2 billion users, Instagram is expected to reach a billion users worldwide before the end of the year, possibly surpassing the active users of Facebook Messenger and WeChat (a Chinese messaging app from Tencent).

Above all, avoid the perils

Social media has drawbacks as well, and no app is free from them. The most recurring reasons why they can be a negative presence is bullying and rumor spreading (27%), their effect on relationships and contact (17%), unrealistic views of life, body image, and feelings of inadequacy (15%), being a source of distraction and addiction (14%), or peer pressure (12%). 4% indicated social media can cause or lead to mental health issues. In April, Instagram announced the creation of a “wellbeing” team.

Many of these results may have something to do with the continuing rise of smartphones, owned by 95% of the survey, and never under 93% when controlled for gender, race, or income. 45% say they are almost continuously connected and 44% use it several times a day, while only 11% use it once a day or less. The survey made no distinction between social media as an outlet for “passive” content consumption and “active” sharing or broadcasting of users’ own work and creations.

Read “Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018” and download the complete report at pewinternet.org.■

ecreators logoThis Moodle Governance related post is made possible by: eCreators. Moodle for the enterprise, K12 and corporate. Australia and Singapore. To learn more about eCreators, click here.

Previous articleUsability, Performance, And Data: How To Ensure LMS Excellence For Years To Come
Next articleIntroducing #MoodleWorldCup 2018: Play To Choose The World’s Best Moodle Plugin On The Surface Of The Surface Of Earth!


  1. […] Federated MoodleNet. While the current blueprints for the social network show limited functionality, it could very well be Moodle’s interface for the coming decade. The challenge: Going beyond the already aging social network paradigm and anticipating the future expectations of digital interactions and user feeds. (In other words, Instagram, not Facebook.) […]


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.